|
R&D Systems
baf231 Baf231, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/10__1158_slash_0008___5472__can___15___2581-94-0-1?v=R%26D+Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
baf231 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
goat anti egfr Goat Anti Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pm34374948-49-25-28?v=R%26D+Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
goat anti egfr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
biotinylated anti human egfr Biotinylated Anti Human Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/us12269862-1098-70-74?v=R%26D+Systems Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti human egfr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
94/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
biotinylated anti egfr antibody ![]() Biotinylated Anti Egfr Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pm32911314-119-1-4?v=R%26D+Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
OriGene
biotinylated anti egfr antibody ![]() Biotinylated Anti Egfr Antibody, supplied by OriGene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pm33942501-88-52-55?v=OriGene Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
biotinylated egfr ![]() Biotinylated Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pm40002679-101-11-13?v=R%26D+Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated egfr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
R&D Systems
biotinylated anti egfr ![]() Biotinylated Anti Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pmc05538436__supp_gad__291773__116_Supplemental_Information-14-61-65?v=R%26D+Systems Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti egfr - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
93/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
MedImmune llc
recombinant mammalian expressed biotinylated monomeric human egfr antibody ![]() Recombinant Mammalian Expressed Biotinylated Monomeric Human Egfr Antibody, supplied by MedImmune llc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/us12065496-737-26-30?v=MedImmune+llc Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
recombinant mammalian expressed biotinylated monomeric human egfr antibody - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH
biotinylated anti-egfr monoclonal antibody 528 ![]() Biotinylated Anti Egfr Monoclonal Antibody 528, supplied by Biozol Diagnostica Vertrieb GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more https://www.bioz.com/product/biotinylated+egfr+antibodies/pmc03720882-117-31-36?v=Biozol+Diagnostica+Vertrieb+GmbH Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
biotinylated anti-egfr monoclonal antibody 528 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-07
90/100 stars
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
purified EGFR biotinylated mouse monoclonal detection antibody validated for Luminex assays
|
Buy from Supplier |
|
The Human EGFR Cetuximab Biotinylated Antibody from R D Systems is a human monoclonal antibody to EGFR This antibody reacts with human The Human EGFR Cetuximab Biotinylated Antibody has been validated for the following applications
|
Buy from Supplier |
Image Search Results
Journal: Biosensors & bioelectronics
Article Title: An aptamer-based magnetic flow cytometer using matched filtering.
doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2020.112362
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. A. Real-time measurements of Panc-1 model study using E07 aptamer. B. Enumeration plot calculated from MFC measurements, and the inset shows the visualized Panc-1 cells captured by microscope. C. Correlation between mean magnetic intensity (MMI) and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) with different linkers, anti-EGFR- antibody (shown as Ab) and E07 aptamer, and pancreatic cancer cell lines, Panc-1 and MIA PaCa-2. The error bars represent the counting difference throughout the measurements across 8 addressable sensors.
Article Snippet: A
Techniques: Microscopy, Fluorescence
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: Unveiling mutational dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer patients by quantitative EGFR profiling in vesicular RNA.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12976
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 1. Experimental validation of the NBI-ddPCR method. (A) Overview of the NBI experimental protocol and study workflow for high- sensitivity detection of EGFR activating and resistance mutations on plasma clinical samples. EVs were isolated from patient samples collected at baseline, first clinical evaluation (C3D1), and progression, and compared with available ctDNA and tissue biopsy analysis. Plasma-isolated EVs were directly analyzed through one-step ddPCR with mutation-specific fluorescent probes that could detect in a single assay the presence of both the WT and mutated EGFR mRNAs. Prior to mutation detection by ddPCR, a fraction of the isolated EVs were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-EGFR antibody beads to potentially enrich for tumor-derived EVs. (B) Validation of the one-step ddPCR EGFR mutation detection assay on EVs isolated from NSCLC cells by NBI (n = 3, mean with SD). No statistical test was applied for comparison. (C) Validation of the one-step ddPCR EGFR mutation detection assay on EVs isolated from plasma samples of healthy individuals by NBI. Number of mutated EGFR copies on EV-RNA obtained by NBI-ddPCR is represented as the number of copies/105 EVs.
Article Snippet: The screen assay was carried out in 384-OptiPlate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a final volume of 20 lL using 105–106 vesicles as template, 15 lg mL 1 of Nickel Chelate AlphaLISA Acceptor Beads (Perkin Elmer), 10 lg mL 1 of AlphaScreen Streptavidin Donor beads (Perkin Elmer) and 20 ng of
Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Clinical Proteomics, Isolation, Mutagenesis, Immunoprecipitation, Derivative Assay, Detection Assay, Comparison
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: Unveiling mutational dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer patients by quantitative EGFR profiling in vesicular RNA.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12976
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 2. Detection of EGFR mutations in tumor tissue and sensitivity by liquid biopsy. (A) Rate of co-occurrence of multiple mutations (activating and resistance) at baseline, as measured by NBI-ddPCR (numbers in parenthesis indicate the relative number of cases over total, n = 27; WT indicates samples negative for any type of mutation tested; percentage values have been rounded). (B) Comparison of liquid biopsy by EV-RNA NBI-ddPCR with canonical ctDNA (qPCR) analysis for the detection of E746_A750del, L858R, and T790M mutations, shown as percentage of concordance (referred as sensitivity in detecting positivity to EGFR mutations) with the corresponding tissue biopsy (numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of patients that had matched results between tissue and liquid biopsy, n = 27). No statistical test was applied for comparison. (C) Frequency of patients with EGFR-activating and T790M resistance mutations detected in tissue and liquid biopsy, at baseline, first clinical evaluation (C3D1), and progression (other mutations: L747_S752del, E746-S752>V, E746-T751del, G719S, L833V, L861Q, L858M, exon 20 insertion; WT indicates samples negative for any type of mutation tested). Only E746_A750del, L858R, and T790M were tested on EV-RNA following NBI-ddPCR. Sum of percentages may exceed 100% of total because of rounding and concomitant presence of multiple mutations in the same patients (n = 27; ctDNA values obtained by mean of qPCR). No statistical test was applied for comparison (D) Difference in detected fractions of positive cases with EGFR-activating and T790M resistance mutations from C3D1 to progression, as measured by EV-RNA liquid biopsy (numbers in parenthesis indicate the relative number of cases over total, n = 27; percentage values have been rounded).
Article Snippet: The screen assay was carried out in 384-OptiPlate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a final volume of 20 lL using 105–106 vesicles as template, 15 lg mL 1 of Nickel Chelate AlphaLISA Acceptor Beads (Perkin Elmer), 10 lg mL 1 of AlphaScreen Streptavidin Donor beads (Perkin Elmer) and 20 ng of
Techniques: Mutagenesis, Comparison
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: Unveiling mutational dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer patients by quantitative EGFR profiling in vesicular RNA.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12976
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3. Tumor heterogeneity and high frequency of T790M mutation by testing EGFR in ctDNA and EV-RNA. Intra-patient heterogeneity of EGFR mutations and levels of T790M detected by liquid biopsy analysis at baseline and progression. At baseline, analysis of ctDNA was performed by both qPCR and ddPCR. Only samples tested for E746_A750del, L858R, and T790M are included (n = 27; WT indicates samples negative for any type of mutation tested). Number of mutated EGFR copies on EV-RNA obtained by NBI-ddPCR is represented as linear multiple of 1010 copiesmL1.
Article Snippet: The screen assay was carried out in 384-OptiPlate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a final volume of 20 lL using 105–106 vesicles as template, 15 lg mL 1 of Nickel Chelate AlphaLISA Acceptor Beads (Perkin Elmer), 10 lg mL 1 of AlphaScreen Streptavidin Donor beads (Perkin Elmer) and 20 ng of
Techniques: Mutagenesis
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: Unveiling mutational dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer patients by quantitative EGFR profiling in vesicular RNA.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12976
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 4. Longitudinal analysis of EGFR mutations in NSCLC patients revealed by vesicular RNA. Longitudinal measurements of EV profiles were taken at baseline, first clinical evaluation (C3D1), and progression, alongside to tumor dimensional changes. (A) Box and whiskers distribution (median, min to max) of tumor size determined by the sum of longest diameters (SLD) and compared between baseline and C3D1 (n = 23; *P > 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, two-tailed) and between progression and C3D1 (n = 22; n.s., not significant, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, two-tailed). (B) Total EV count, represented as Log10 conversion of 1010 copies per mL of plasma, and EV size quantified by TRPS. (C) Number of mutated EGFR copies on EV-RNA as measured by NBI-ddPCR and represented as Log10 conversion of 1010 copiesmL1 (WT indicates samples negative for any type of mutation tested). (D) Number of mutated EGFR copies on EV-RNA as measured by NBI-ddPCR, represented as Log10 conversion of 105 copiesmL1, and quantified upon immunoprecipitation (IP) against the membrane EGFR protein on isolated EVs. Scatter plots of individual value in (B–D) are represented as mean with SD (*P > 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001; n.s: not significant; Wilcoxon signed-rank test, two-tailed).
Article Snippet: The screen assay was carried out in 384-OptiPlate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a final volume of 20 lL using 105–106 vesicles as template, 15 lg mL 1 of Nickel Chelate AlphaLISA Acceptor Beads (Perkin Elmer), 10 lg mL 1 of AlphaScreen Streptavidin Donor beads (Perkin Elmer) and 20 ng of
Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Clinical Proteomics, Mutagenesis, Immunoprecipitation, Membrane, Isolation
Journal: Molecular oncology
Article Title: Unveiling mutational dynamics in non-small cell lung cancer patients by quantitative EGFR profiling in vesicular RNA.
doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12976
Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 6. Association of NBI-ddPCR analysis with clinical features and patient outcome. (A) Distribution of the changes in the ratio of total number of EVs between the first clinical evaluation (C3D1) to progression in relation to patient survival status. Differences between the two groups are not significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test; data are represented as mean with SD). (B) Box and whiskers distribution (median, min to max) of radiologic PD, defined by RECIST 1.1, in association with the survival status (Alive, n = 8; Dead, n = 14; ****P < 0.0001, unpaired two-tailed t-test). (C) Box and whiskers representation (median, min to max) of radiologic PD, defined by RECIST 1.1, as divided into quartile distributions of groups of patients (Q1, n = 7; Q2, n = 5; Q3, n = 5; Q4, n = 6; n.s., not significant, *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s comparison test; data are represented as mean with SD). (D) Distribution of the changes in the ratio of total number of EVs between the first clinical evaluation (C3D1) to progression in the four radiologic PD quartile groups as defined in (C). Differences in the four groups are not significant (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s comparison test). (E) Representative CT scan images of selected patients at the three clinical time points with parallel detection of the driver E746_A750del (orange circles) and the resistance T790M (purple circles) EGFR mutations in liquid biopsy (EV-RNA and ctDNA), as compared to tissue analysis. The largest target lesion is pointed out (yellow arrows) in the upper panel, while the volume of all lesions is represented as the SLD. Analysis of cfDNA was performed by qPCR; number of mutated EGFR copies on EV-RNA obtained by NBI-ddPCR is represented as multiple of 1010 copiesmL1. WT: wild- type samples for the indicated mutation.
Article Snippet: The screen assay was carried out in 384-OptiPlate (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) in a final volume of 20 lL using 105–106 vesicles as template, 15 lg mL 1 of Nickel Chelate AlphaLISA Acceptor Beads (Perkin Elmer), 10 lg mL 1 of AlphaScreen Streptavidin Donor beads (Perkin Elmer) and 20 ng of
Techniques: Two Tailed Test, Comparison, Computed Tomography, Mutagenesis
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 1. Schematic representation of anti-EGFR CAR lentiviral LentiONE expression vector (GEGTech). The CAR construct contains an anti-EGFR scFv fused to a CD8a hinge and trans- membrane domain, a 4-1BB intracellular, and a CD3ζ signaling domain. SP—signaling peptide leader sequence. The CAR is expressed from a PGK promoter, while the GFP (green fluorescent protein) reporter gene is expressed from a miniCMV promoter, part of the same bidirectional promoter unit. 5′,3′-LTR—long tandem repeats; Ψ—RNA packaging signal; cPPT—central polypurine tract; polyA—polyadenylation signal; WPRE—woodchuck hepatitis promoter regulatory element.
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Construct, Membrane, Sequencing
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. (A) Transduction efficiency assessed by the flow cytometry analysis of GFP-expressing cells at 3 days post-transduction. In the TNK-polarized group (stimulated with cytokines and beads), a higher transduction efficiency was observed (83 ± 8% vs. 26 ± 9%, p = 0.001). (B,C) Dot plot graphs of CAR-NK-polarized cells (B) and CAR-TNK-polarized cells (C); cells were treated with biotinylated EGFR and streptavidin-APC. The upper right quadrant (UR) indicates the population of CAR+ cells (FITC-positive and APC-positive); **—p < 0.01.
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Transduction, Flow Cytometry, Expressing
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. (A) Dot-plot analysis of MICA/B expression in MDA-MB468 (red) cells vs. SK-BR3 (blue) cells showed a similar expression profile. (B) The MDA-MB468 cell line (red) exhibited a higher EGFR expression compared to SK-BR3 cells (blue). (C) CD1d expression in both cell types is reduced, but with a slight increase in the MDA-MB468 cell line. (D) CD95 (Fas) expression in MDA-MB468 cells (red) vs. SK-BR3 (blue) exhibited a similar expression profile in both cell types.
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Expressing
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 5. Short-term cytotoxic activity of anti-EGFR CAR transduced cells compared to untransduced cells against calcein-labeled target MDA-MB-468 cells (A), SK-BR3 cells (B), K562 cells (C), and allogeneic PBMCs (D). The transduction significantly increased the effector cells’ cytotoxic activity, which correlated with EGFR expression levels in EGFR-expressing tumor cell lines MDA-MB-468 (E:T = 10:1—34 ± 4% vs. 5 ± 1%, p < 0.001; E:T = 5:1—25 ± 2% vs. 3 ± 1%, p < 0.05; E:T = 1:1—10 ± 0.5% vs. 1 ± 0.5%, p < 0.05) and SK-BR-3 (E:T = 10:1—24 ± 2% vs. 6 ± 1%, p < 0.05; E:T = 5:1—17 ± 0.2% vs. 5 ± 0.2%, p < 0.001; E:T = 1:1—3 ± 1% vs. 2 ± 1%, p = 0.28), but without statistical significance in EGFR-negative, NK- sensitive K562 cells, nor allogeneic PBMCs (E:T = 1:1—3.58 ± 2.53% vs. 2.74 ± 1.90%, p = 0.66; E:T = 5:1— 0.79 ± 0.26% vs. 0.84 ± 0.62%, p = 0.90; E:T = 10:1—0.99 ± 0.79% vs. 1.06 ± 0.53%, p = 0.90); ns—not significant (p > 0.05); **—p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Activity Assay, Labeling, Transduction, Expressing
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 12. (A) RTCA analysis of EGFR-expressing MDA-MB468 cells incubated for 24 h with transduced anti-EGFR CAR cells (red) and untransduced cells (blue). (B) RTCA analysis of the EGFR positive SK-BR3 cell line, incubated for 24 hours with CAR-expressing cells (red) and untransduced PBMCs (blue). In the first 2 h, a rapid decline in cell index was observed in both cell lines treated with CAR cells (red). However, this effect was more pronounced in the MDA-MB-468 group. A poor decline was also observed in the untransduced group (blue), which may account for non-specific lysis. The control group experienced constant proliferation (black).
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Expressing, Incubation, Lysis, Control
Journal: Biomedicines
Article Title: Exploring CAR-PBMCs: A Novel Strategy Against EGFR-Positive Tumor Cells.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020264
Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 13. (A) Cell index slopes for MDA-MB468 cells incubated with CAR-expressing and un- transduced cells (UnTD). (B) Cell index slopes for SK-BR3 cells treated with CAR-expressing cells and untransduced (UnTD) cells. The slopes of the cell indices (CI slope) were more negative in the CAR-treated target cells compared to untransduced cells. In the MDA-MB-468 control cells (A), the slope had an overall positive value, suggestive for cell proliferation, compared to a negative value in the SK-BR3 control group, which may reflect the differences in EGFR expression as a mechanism for cell survival, as well as an increased expression of the non-specific activator molecule MICA/B in SK-BR3. The CI slopes for tumor cells incubated with CAR-PBMCs were comparable, with net negative values (MDA-MB468: −0.076 vs. SK-BR3: −0.074, p = 0.1714).
Article Snippet: CAR expression assessment was performed by labeling the transduced cells with
Techniques: Incubation, Expressing, Control
Journal: PLoS ONE
Article Title: Magnetic Nanoparticles as Mediators of Ligand-Free Activation of EGFR Signaling
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068879
Figure Lengend Snippet: Magnetic switches (MS) consisting of SPION covalently coupled to streptavidin further reacted with biotinylated anti-EGFR MAb, in most cases, and biocytin-fluorophore.
Article Snippet: Magnetic switches (MS) capable of targeting EGFR were prepared (except when cells expressed ACP-EGFR, see below) by incubating a 5-fold molar excess of strv-SPIONs, in terms of biotin binding capacity, with
Techniques: